Subscribe!

The Practical
Journal for Church
Leaders
Save 21%



About This Blog


Most Read From PreachingToday.com


Sermons We Like


Videos We Like


Preachers to Watch


Blogs We're Watching


Recommended Reading

June 5, 2007

An old adage claims: “The best interpreter of Scripture is other Scripture.” True. But expositors must not abuse this insight when preaching a particular biblical passage. We must learn the discipline of staying put in the text we’re preaching. I face this challenge every weekend. I have to ask, “When is it appropriate to turn to another passage, and when is it better to stay put in the text I’m preaching?”

This question matters because teaching people how to think biblically means (1) teaching them to follow the flow of thought of a passage and (2) teaching them to connect the ideas of a passage with the overall message of the Bible. The first concern warrants staying put in a text. The second compels us to make connections with a passage we’re preaching and the whole sweep of the Bible. Every time we preach, we have to find the right balance between camping in the text we’re preaching and making forays into other parts of the Bible.

My concern, as I read and listen to some sermons, is that flitting all over the Bible can be a substitute for tracing the argument or the development of a passage. I reviewed a sermon outline recently and noticed that the preacher referred to thirty (yes, thirty!) other passages to develop the six-verse unit he preached. It was clear from the outline that he turned to all of them during the sermon. As I studied the outline more closely, I realized that the sermon got its shape from this assortment of texts scattered around the Bible rather than from the text on which the sermon was based. More accurately, the sermon got its shape from a grid created by the preacher as he read assorted passages related to the various words or topics in his text.

Remember, people learn how to read their Bibles from listening to your sermons! After a steady diet of your sermons, will they opt for a ‘concordance approach’ in which they simply look at the cross-references for every major word in the passage they’re reading? Or, will they develop the instinct to look for the flow of thought, to trace the argument, and to reflect on the figures of speech within this passage? As believers mature in their faith, we want them to make connections between texts of Scripture. We want them to think theologically (in terms of both biblical and systematic theology). But they will not do this well unless they learn first to stay put in a text.

In ‘Part 2’ of this discussion (this Friday’s post), I’ll demonstrate from Proverbs 1:1-7 how to ‘stay put in a text’ while turning to some key passages in the rest of Scripture which connect to and illuminate it.

Posted by Steve Mathewson at 9:30 AM on June 5, 2007

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/457





Comments

When I was in preaching school (churches of Christ - Sunset School of Preaching in Lubbock, TX) we had a preaching competition (I know what you're thinking, so am I, but we still had it). My class nominated me to participate. I choose 2Corinthians 10:1-6. I quoted no other Scripture during my lesson. I lost by 1/2 point. One of the judges counted points off because I didn't quote other passages. Since then I haven't let that episode rule how I preach. In my "expository" preaching I stay pretty much with the text. Only when an obvious Scripture pops into my mind during study will I use it. I don't go to the concordance or topical Bibles looking for more Scripture to quote during a sermon.

During school we had a prominent preacher in our fellowship come and do a meeting. One of my classmates counted one night and there were 75 passages quoted from memory without turning to the passage quoted.

I'm looking forward to your handling of the Proverbs text. I like your two concerns in trying to figure out when to add other passages. I hope to remember and incorporate those concerns in my study.

Posted by: Bob Bliss on June 5, 2007

I try to stay put in the text but have found that showing how the idea of the text is applied in other places of the Bible is helpful. For example, in a sermon from the life of Abraham I went (in my manuscript) to 2 Chronicles 20 and Isaiah 40(something) to show how later the Jews applied the lessons learned from Abraham's relationship with God. In the actual preaching I skipped over the Isaiah passage because 2 Chronicles adequately made the point.

Posted by: Robert Talley on June 6, 2007

I love this blog Steve you clearly know an aweful lot but am I right in thinking from your asides and comments that most weeks you only preach the one message. The reason I say this is because some of your thoughts are so good, but have to be balanced by virtue of the fact that I am writing two different sermons every week for my congregation. I wish it wern't so, so I could be more focused on the one message with all that entails.

Tell me will you provide any thoughts and helps for those of us who having poured everthing we can into one sermon have to do it all over again in the same week for the same day?

Great site, thanks for the inspiration

D.

Posted by: Rev Dave Eadie on June 7, 2007

I agree, the danger of topical preaching is that one may not sourcing EVERY scripture on a given topic, thus giving an inaccurate complete picture. Expositional preaching is safe because we know that no scripture contradicts another so we can go through and allowing God to guide us in the process. :) S

Soli Deo Gloria
Dan

Posted by: Daniel Henderson on June 7, 2007

DAVE: You're right . . . at this point in my ministry, I'm only preparing one sermon per week. I'd love to address your question about the challenge of preparing more than one sermon a week. It's such an important question that I'll dovote an entire post to it in the next couple weeks. In the meantime, it would help me know what the settings are for your two sermons. I'm assuming that one is for your main worship service(s) and the other is for a mid-week or a Sunday night service. Is that right?

Posted by: Steve Mathewson on June 7, 2007

"Remember, people learn how to read their Bibles from listening to your sermons!"

This is, unfortunately, a very true and frightening statement. When we point people to the biblical text and then proceed to present a message that is not God's message in that text, but one of our own creation, we have committed a grave sin. We have, in effect, overwritten - like using the insert key on our keyboard - God's TRUTH with our "truth". It does not matter how good our "truth" is, since we have, for our audience, deleted (possibly permanently) God's TRUTH in that text. God Himself condemns anyone who takes away from His Word, but that is unquestionably what is being done, dare I say, in most churches on a very regular basis.

Also, we are teaching people not to hear God's Voice in the Scriptures, but our's. The harmful results of this cannot be calculated. People will inevitably become confused by the disparity between what they read in the Bible and what we say it says. If they submit to our fabricated interpretations\applications they can only conclude that their understandings, which may actually be more faithful to God's meanings, are wrong, making the Bible too obscure for them to comprehend, and themselves wholly dependent upon the "spiritual" preacher who is able to discover such profound "hidden meanings" in the Bible. The long term results of this common practice has been to alienate people from studying God's Word, or to produce an "anything goes" attitude toward interpreting/applying the Scriptures. There is little doubt that much of the well-documented, massive biblical confusion existing in the church today originates from our pulpits.

Posted by: Roy on June 9, 2007

Hi Steve

I look forward to that post as I'm finding your insights very helpful. Yes your right in your estimation we hold to seperate services on a Sunday most come for the morning, so return for the evening and some only come in the evening...we have a dwindling number in the evenings as well; a factor in many British churches today.

Grace n peace

Dave

Posted by: Dave on June 11, 2007

ROY: Thanks for the follow-up words of warning. Every preacher should take them to heart.

DAVE: It's a privilege to interact with you and get first-hand insight about the challenges you face as a preacher in Great Britain. I'm interested in this because we have a several members of our congregation who hail from England, and a couple of them will be returning in the next year.

Posted by: Steve Mathewson on June 26, 2007

Post a comment






Remember Me?

(1500 characters max; you may use HTML tags for style)

 


  back to top