Subscribe!

The Practical
Journal for Church
Leaders
Save 21%



About This Blog


Most Read From PreachingToday.com


Sermons We Like


Videos We Like


Preachers to Watch


Blogs We're Watching


Recommended Reading

June 29, 2007

I took time earlier this week to go back and interact with the comments to all of the June 2007 blog posts. Thanks to all of you who take the time and effort to post comments. The discussion is helpful and stimulating. One recent comment referred to the “common mistake of spending too much time on commentaries.” I’m going to address that issue in this post. To be honest, I know few, if any, pastors who spend too much time in commentaries. But I see a lot of mistakes made in using commentaries. I must confess, too, that I’ve made all of them in the past. So, here are some common “commentary mistakes.”

1. Using commentaries exclusively or too quickly in the process. Preachers, we’ve got to do our own exegetical work in the text first! I don’t consult commentaries until late in the process. It’s only after hours of reading, re-reading, observing, doing mechanical layouts or plot analysis, looking at grammatical issues, doing word studies, and exploring the context that I consult commentaries.

2. Using too many commentaries. There is a point of no return! Can a preacher really benefit from looking at 12 or 15 or 20 commentaries? I have a hunch that this either results from or contributes to mistake #1. When studying a text, I use 2-3 main commentaries and 2-3 secondary commentaries. I read the ‘main’ ones entirely, and I’ll check the ‘secondary’ ones on key issues or difficulties.

3. Using sub-standard commentaries. It’s critical to use the best commentaries available. By ‘sub-standard,’ I don’t mean ‘bad.’ I simply mean that Peter O’Brien and Harold Hoehner have raised the bar for Ephesians, and Daniel Block and K. Lawson Younger have set the standard of excellence for Judges. No amount of older or devotional or popular level commentaries will take you to the level to which the best commentaries take you! For recommendations, I suggest starting with Old Testament Commentary Survey by Tremper Longman III and New Testament Commentary Survey by D. A. Carson. Both are published by Baker, and both have been revised for 2007.

4. Using commentaries to the neglect of prayer and meditation. This is related to mistake #1. We preachers will all do well to follow the practice of the late William Lane. In the preface to his commentary on Mark, Lane describes his practice of laying his material before the Lord on his knees. Maybe that’s why Lane’s commentary is one of my all-time favorites! Our study of the text, including our forays into commentaries, must be bathed in prayer and meditation.

5. Refusing to use commentaries. This may result from an over-reaction to one of the above mistakes or to naivete or to arrogance! I own a set of Keil and Delitzsch commentaries on the O.T. because of the misdirected zeal of a young theological student! He put his set up for sale, announcing that he was going to do his own work and not rely on the work of others. It seems to me that this misses one of the implications of Ephesians 4:11-12! We need to listen to the godly teachers of Scripture – both past and present – which God has given to the church!

Posted by Steve Mathewson at 7:00 AM on June 29, 2007

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/493





Comments

All excellent points - especially number one and number four. Thanks!

Posted by: Ray Fowler on June 29, 2007

I also give kudos to #1 and #4! Thanks for sharing.

Posted by: Greg Johnson on June 29, 2007

Perhaps we develop bad habits in seminary? I know that in any of my classes the professor is expecting to see 20 plus references for just about any decent sized paper... Would that not encourage the habit of consulting too many commentaries during preaching prep?

I refer to commentaries at the end of the process as well. I want to make sure that what I have prepared aligns with the analysis of those that I respect and have been studying this much longer than I have. I find some "mentors" that I like and respect, and then check to see if what I have written aligns with their approach. For instance on just about any Old Testament passage I would check out Walter Brueggemann. I like and respect his approach to Old Testament scholarship and interpretation.

Posted by: Steve on June 29, 2007

Post a comment






Remember Me?

(1500 characters max; you may use HTML tags for style)

 


  back to top