Though I can't say I've read everything out there on the subject, I can say that Thomas Long's "Stolen Goods: Tempted to Plagiarize" is the best thing I've read so far about issues pertaining to preaching and plagiarism. Brian Larson, editor of PreachingToday.com, offered the same sentiments when he first received permission for us to run the article. If you haven't read it, take a moment to check it out. Also, we'd love for you to give a listen to the most recent episode of PT Talk to hear us discuss this controversial topic. This entry builds off of thoughts I briefly shared in that audio cast.
I confess that I'm deeply concerned about exegetical theft—stealing someone's insights and interpretations with nary a nod or wink to their scholarship. I don't think a preacher needs to give props to Colin Brown every time he defines a word, but it certainly wouldn't hurt. If a preacher's theology of new creation has been profoundly shaped by N. T. Wright's Surprised by Hope, she ought to give it a hearty slap on the back in the presence of the church.
I'm just as deeply concerned about homiletical theft—stealing someone's ideas and imaginative renderings without a simple word of gracious thanks. I think one ought to have the respect to say—even if only in the church bulletin—that the goat on the stage is there because of Rob Bell. If you're looking at the many ways "good snakes become bad snakes," I think Haddon Robinson deserves a little credit.
But along with exegetical and homiletical theft, there's another act of sermonic thievery that must be considered. What about experiential theft? The preacher and the congregation have a working agreement that the preacher will spend at least a fair portion of his or her week allowing the cleansing fire of a given text to lick their feet in a holy act with the Refiner. Though the congregation is expected to do the same in their own right, it is the preacher who must stand before the audience and say, "I've suffered my way through this text all week long. I've learned. I've been made accountable. I've cried. I've bled. I've healed. And I've come to you this morning with a way forward for myself, and for us as a community." In essence: I have experienced the hot blast of this text, and I've returned with a word.
Most days we probably wouldn't choose to do it, but we did. Besides, we ask our people to have their noses and hearts in the Word, ready and willing for holy fire. Who are we to do otherwise ourselves? If both parties come out ashy but refined, a homiletical synergy emerges that's priceless. We mustn't ever settle for having some other preacher feel the burn of Divine fire at his or her feet so we can casually take their scorching experience and claim it as our own. There are few things more devastating to a Body than the preacher who stands behind a pulpit engaging in some grand act of blowing on what many know to be nothing more than perfectly manicured feet. Sooner or later the audience will tease out the truth—if only by whether or not the soles of your feet are adequately scarred.
Posted by Brian Lowery at 3:02 PM on April 21, 2008
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1125
Post a comment



Comments
if you preach the word of God.
then it is God's words through you.
and if it is God's words, then they do not belong to anyone but God.
and if someone uses them and said that they wrote it, it is God's business.
for God gave the words in the first place.
maybe they are being shared with someone this way that needs to hear them.
who are we to cry out and complain...hey! these were MY words and MY work!
do we need to get CREDIT for our work that we do for God?
we, as people belonging to God, need to get over ourselves.
Posted by: nancy on May 4, 2008
Nancy, You are right when you say any kind of arrogance about the work God does through us is to be avoided at all costs. Pride is awful, and we shouldn't let it overcome us. However, that's not what Brian was tackling here at all. He is tackling the chasm a preacher creates between himself and the text. That's a particularly harmful arrogance all together. I happen to think we should be wrestling with the text in the way Brian describes it BECAUSE of the person who needs to hear the word. His point is not at all concerning credit. It's concerning honesty and a sense of character among the people whom you serve. After all, they'll never get the word if the preacher's deception or lack of allowing the Word to rub up against their life is glaringly apparent over time.
Posted by: Mitchell on May 4, 2008
interestng, the thought of the keeping of honesty in our walk with God. that is so important to all of us. i think many people are expecting something from the conventional modern form of gatherings that is actually things that should be lived out in their own life. maybe this expectation has had an effect on the spiritual life of the preacher. if the body can not learn to do their part...they start to expect the preacher to fill them up instead of God. it is just to much to ask. i think a pastor can easly get sucked dry by the body he serves. if the pastor does not watch every step in following God then it can be an easy path to feeding the lazy, hungry expectant needy body some fast food...instead of cooking up a healthy slow cooked meal.
i think that a lot of the problem lies with the body as a whole. not all are eating at home and in their own lives they are eating fast food instead listening and seeking God...then they think that one quick snack once week from a sermon will do the job.
Posted by: nancy on May 5, 2008