Reading the Boss's cultural texts
In my opinion there are only a few "big artists" out there who can write songs that capture the essence of the times. The master is still Bob Dylan, but following right behind is Bruce Springsteen.
When I was growing up, I wasn't raised on a steady diet of Bruce like I was Bob. I discovered Springsteen's music later in life when I picked up a greatest hits package on a whim. At first I was drawn to the sheer exuberance of what he pulled off with the E Street Band. It's always the sound that hits you first. But then I explored the lyrics and discovered that no one tells the American story - no one captures the spirit of the times - quite like Bruce Springsteen. They call him the Boss, and he earned it straight up.
But why am I talking about Springsteen? Because everyone is still buzzing about his half-time performance at Sunday night's game. And what a savvy marketing move that was on Springsteen's part. Now that everyone is talking about him, they're also talking about his new album, Working on a Dream. In fact, that's what I want to talk about in this post. But to talk about 2009's Working on a Dream, I first have to talk about two other Springsteen albums: 2002's The Rising and 2007's Magic.
The Rising
With The Rising, Springsteen was one of the first major artists to deal directly with the awful events of 9/11. I could wax poetic about each song on the album, but to save time, I'll focus on just two: "The Rising" and "My City of Ruins." When you take these two powerhouse songs into consideration, you soon realize that the album - title and all - wants you to weigh something we all agree is quite beautiful: the hope of resurrection.
Consider the title track first. "The Rising" tells the story of a firefighter making his way through the darkness of that awful day in September, stretching and straining to escape the horror. He has "dreams of life" as Springsteen sings, and at the song's climax, the dream becomes a reality - perhaps here on earth, but probably in the afterlife. It's ambiguous. Either way, at once the song's story becomes a metaphor for all of America after 9/11 - even for humanity as a whole, 9/11 or no 9/11. And by the close of the song, you cannot help but feel that Springsteen's "rising" is his own gritty terminology for "resurrection." Lest you think I'm skating on thin ice about this, take the time to check out his song catalogue throughout his career. The man unashamedly works religious themes into the framework of his music - so much so that any time another artist does the same thing (example: The Hold Steady), they are compared to the Boss. And if you still question my lyrical/thematic "exegesis," consider "My City of Ruins." The narrative arc of this final song on the album reaches its climax when a determined Springsteen crashes his way through to an emphatic bridge: "Come on, rise up! Come on, rise up! Come on, rise up!" Though "My City of Ruins" wasn't officially released until 2002, Springsteen had written it just days after 9/11, performing it live for a telecast that raised funds for those most affected by the terrorist attacks. Springsteen chose to be accompanied by a gospel choir - a move that seemed to say he wasn't bent on preaching some sort of phoenix-like, mythological narrative; he was bent on preaching the gospel - even if it's not quite the gospel we're used to as preachers.
The Rising was, and still is, one of the most breathtaking albums of hope I've ever heard. I actually think it did something you wouldn't expect a rock album to do after a national tragedy: it helped people heal and learn to believe again, because it perfectly spoke to what they wanted - a resurrection of sorts. The Boss did what he does best: he captured everything in just one word - "rising."
I remember that at the time I hoped believers would push aside petty feelings about Springsteen being a "secular" artist to see that "knowing Bruce" was to know the times in a meaningful way - akin to what Paul did in his own ministry (who was mimicking Christ). I remember hoping that we were going to push for a rising, a resurrection through our own preaching of a new heaven and a new earth held together by a Christ that says, 'Behold, I am making all things new." I remember hoping we would do so all the more when I read this gut-wrenching line from one review at the time of the album's release: "There is more rising on The Rising than in a month of church."
Magic
As much as I'd like to skip ahead to 2009's Working on a Dream at this point, it would be a mistake to leapfrog another important Springsteen album - an album that gave us a one-word, clarifying glimpse into the American spirit. Five years after the release of The Rising - and after a few other side projects (including the exceptional Seeger Sessions) - Springsteen got the E Street Band back together to create 2007's Magic. Though there were a few happy, hopeful tunes in the lineup, anyone who listened to this one came face to face with a rather jaded Bruce.
A little backstory will help. For the 2004 election, Springsteen hopped on the campaign trail to help boost the prospects of Democratic nominee John Kerry. Springsteen felt everything had gone downhill since 9/11 - that we had earned the world's goodwill, only to squander it through aggressive military campaigns. All that healing, only to have all the wounds reopened. With that conviction heavy on his heart, he grabbed his guitar and tried to sing America into the voting booth. We all know how the election turned out, and Springsteen limped back to his home state of New Jersey in a fog of disappointment.
The songs Springsteen released on Magic flirted with hopelessness. The first track - "Radio Nowhere" - set the tone in its own ambiguous way. When I first heard it, it seemed like a seemingly harmless song about the downfall of FM rock (something I'm sure Springsteen has a strong opinion about). Then I listened to it again, and it sounded like biting political commentary. When Springsteen snarled, "Is there anybody alive out there?" it became clear to me that he was trying to wake his listeners up to something deep in his heart: that 2007 - with another election looming large - was going to be a time for somber reflection that he hoped would result in radical change.
The rest of the songs were just as searing as the first track, but Springsteen gets most blunt with the one-two punch of "Magic" and "Last to Die." The former is a devastating look at a con artist who masquerades as a magician, using sleight of hand to fool the audience into mindless submission. The latter is a bitter look at what Springsteen feels is a senseless, useless war. There is no doubt he was looking to land a knockout punch on Bush when he wrote this potent duo.
Magic was, and still is, one of the most breathtaking albums of doubt, anxiety, and even outright cynicism that I've ever heard. And once again, I actually think it did something you wouldn't expect a rock album to do: it pushed people toward rejecting what was for the hope of what could be. The Boss did it again: he captured everything in just one word: "magic." He was saying what more and more people were beginning to say: "Enough already. Let's get something - someone - we can believe in. Someone or something that rings true - not some sleight of hand number."
And once again, I found myself hoping believers would push aside petty feelings about Springsteen's politics to see that "knowing Bruce" was to know the times in a meaningful way. I hoped that regardless of where we land concerning the political aisle - right, left, or dead center - we could see that people had had enough. People were burnt out on "business as usual." Why do you think both campaigns - Obama's and McCain's - had to run on themes of change? And what did/does that mean for not only those in politics, but for those of us in ministry - again, regardless of how we felt about where Springsteen landed? A wave of stunning change was coming, and we needed to be ready for it. People didn't want magic in any way, shape, or form. They wanted something they could believe in. Springsteen captured that spirit masterfully, and it rattled me concerning my own ministry and interaction with others.
Working on a Dream
All of this finally brings us to 2009's Working on a Dream. I picked it up the day it came out (January 27), and I can say after a few listens that it's pretty clear to me that once again, the Boss has captured the times perfectly - not in one word, but in one potent phrase.
In a recent article in Time magazine, James Poniewozik, after having seen Springsteen perform at the inaugural show, made a fascinating observation about the journey of Springsteen's music since 9/11: "Bruce Springsteen kicked off the [inaugural] show with "The Rising," his 2002 anthem to the heroes of 9/11. The song evolved over the Bush years; it began as a eulogy, then was used as a campaign song by both John Kerry and Obama. Now it played as if America was looking back to the early days after 9/11 and asking for a do-over, to return to the moment before that communal spirit curdled into acrimony."
The idea of a national "do-over" is the very essence of Working on a Dream. It might very well be the essence of how America feels right now. You have to admit that most people are thinking: We've botched things. We'd like a chance to get it right. We're willing to work our knuckles to the bone to do it. Which sounds an awful lot like the lyrics to Springsteen's newest title track.
I'm well aware that at this point, you've got a thousand different politicized feelings about all of this. I do, too! I do! I would only ask that we both set them aside for just a moment and simply accept the fact that the Boss is right: people want to "work on a dream." They voted in light of that. Two million gathered in Washington in light of that. So, what can we do with that? If we are worried about it - and we probably should be to a certain degree - what can we do to redeem it?
I really want to leave this open-ended - which is quite hard for me to do, because my mind is spinning with ideas. I think there is a lot to uphold and a lot to contend with in this cultural text, this general ethos in the public square. Why wouldn't we want to tap into the dreaming state of the nation, offering a hand in partnership in the appropriate areas, while also offering a hand of correction where the dream is a little too American-centric and thus a lot less kingdom-centric? For example, the overall passion for working on the dream of reconciliation (racial, global, political) is as Christ-like as you can get. People are crying out for the fulfillment of Ephesians 1:10 without even possibly knowing it. Why would we turn away from that? On the other hand, a Christ-less reconciliation is reconciliation without a center. To borrow an overused metaphor: it's like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. And this is just one thought I'm pondering based on this new phrase the Boss has given me to turn over in my head - a phrase that, I believe, captures the spirit of the times like few other things I've seen or read or listened to. But I don't care to go further, because I'd like to hear from you. If the Boss is right - that people are ready to roll up their sleeves for a do-over, to "work on a dream" - what is our role in that as preachers? If you were to preach a series on kingdom dreams - even playfully calling it "Working on a Dream" - what would you do? What would you cover? What would you uphold? What would you contend? Let's talk.
Brian Lowery is managing editor of PreachingToday.com.Posted by Brian Lowery at 5:00 PM on February 5, 2009


Comments
Thanks, Brian. This is fantastic. It occurs to me that Israel was "working on a dream" when Jesus Christ walked onto the scene. And he did just what you're describing--he channeled the national ethos toward himself and redefined its hope. I think you're exactly right; to miss this opportunity to speak directly into people's pain and experience would be a terrible mistake.
Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Brandon on February 6, 2009
Gee, Thanks, Brian! Just like the first comment, how grateful we are to have a NEW Messiah! And a Disciple named Bruce helped Him get elected! Golly, Brian, last time I checked this new President is HUMAN! And gazillionaire Disciple Bruce is HUMAN too.! As a a Christian , should you not focus on Jesus, free will and not the seductive, worldly power of pop stars and politicians?
God help us. Idolatry is alive and well.
Posted by: Richard Bacon on February 7, 2009
Brian,
Thanks for the evocative article. Unfortunately, reconciliation (Eph. 1: 10) is not possible with the world. Many artists have borrowed Christian themes, stripped out Christ, and then redefined the terms to support a different gospel (U2, Yes, Bruce Cockburn, the list is endless). The Working on a Dream concept captures the spirit of the times alright, but unless the dream is "in Christ" (Eph. 1:10) it is doomed to fail. Bruce's dream has nothing to do with Jesus, in fact he rails against Christianity. His dream is salvation through political change. There is no political messiah; Jesus proved that on the cross.
Eph 1: 10
that in the dispensation of the fullness of the times He might gather together in one all things in Christ.
Posted by: Lee on February 7, 2009
Richard - Thanks for stopping by and for sharing some passionate thoughts. I'm afraid you missed the point of the post entirely, though. No one was propping up Obama as some sort of Messiah - not me and not Brandon in the first comment. Bruce might be doing just that - as I've pointed in the post - but not us. And I can safely say we are certainly not advocates for idolatry. That's a little unfair! All I'm saying is that we ought to pay attention to what's going on, perhaps for the very concerns you point out! Please re-read this post - and read it carefully.
Lee - A thanks to you as well. However, I would ask that you go ahead and re-read my post, too. We agree wholeheartedly! Here's what I wrote: "The overall passion for working on the dream of reconciliation (racial, global, political) is as Christ-like as you can get. People are crying out for the fulfillment of Ephesians 1:10 without even possibly knowing it. Why would we turn away from that? On the other hand, a Christ-less reconciliation is reconciliation without a center." So, again - we're on the same page, friend! Well, except for the fact that I believe reconciliation IS possible to certain degrees this side of new heaven and new earth. Otherwise, I would have to throw out all of Ephesians!
Posted by: Brian Lowery on February 7, 2009
OK, I re-read it. Same conclusion (except for the idolatry comment-sorry, my bad)-different angle. "Working on a dream" is all the same as "hope" and "change". You can't disassociate your thesis from the current messianic worship of obama and his rabid, almost universally secular, big government loving celebrity worshipers. But just chanting hope, change and dream didn't keep the One on virtually day one, from reversing the ban on our government funding overseas abortions. Is that the "do-over" you, me and Bruce were dreaming about? We are a deeply divided nation. But as believers, we know there is only one truth. I just pray that idealistic and naive "dreaming" doesn't help create a nation where politicians/government become god replacements. Can we agree this actually might be taking place?
Posted by: Richard on February 7, 2009
Richard - Thanks for re-reading the post. I really appreciate that. I still think you're associating me with Springsteen way too much. I'm a fan of his music, but that doesn't mean I'm a fan of everything about him. All I'm merely saying is that the Boss has captured what a lot of folks are feeling right now. I never once say it's how I'm feeling in the whole post! My stance is simply this: we need to pay attention to just how strongly this spirit is alive and well right now. As for how I feel about it, look throughout the post again, and especially toward the end. I clearly say there are dangerous things at work right now, and there is much to contend with about some of this. Absolutely! That's why I mentioned the need for a kingdom-centric vision, the need for reconciliation with Christ at the center, etc. Still, I think there is something to tap into here while also contending with it. I think Brandon actually put it brilliantly - what is the national ethos (effectively communicated via Bruce), and can we redirect it to where it really belongs?
Posted by: Brian Lowery on February 7, 2009
Brian,
Thank you. Being a Bruce fan I sennsed much of what you are saying but I have never been able to articulate it like that.
I see a classic sermon series there as well - each week a snippett of Working on a Dream plays as the speaker walks to the platform.
The Dream - What could this world look like if we as Christians actually lived out what we say we believe.
The Dream of Hope
The Dream of Love
The Dream of Joy
The Dream of Justice
Etc.
I'll be at the Atlanta show.
Posted by: Matt on February 10, 2009
Good thoughts, Matt. I'm jealous you'll catch the tour. I was hoping to, but I'm out of town when he's here in Chicago. Maybe he'll do a second swing. Who knows!
Posted by: Brian Lowery on February 10, 2009
The point is, pop culture, the music, the films, all give us neon-sign-like clues as to what our culture is feeling and thinking. Leaving aside whether the media reflects or forms it, it is still bottom-line a sign-post to where people are most likely to be listening for a voice of hope - hopefully that would be us - Christians, a voice of hope and peace and love, instead of the voice that tears down and discounts them.
I'm glad for your post, Brian. We need to pay attention to what this culture is up to just like Paul went to Athens and studied their culture before he formed his approach, "this unknown god that you honor, I am here to make him known."
Posted by: Mary Heathman on February 10, 2009
Thanks for the kind words, Mary. And I couldn't agree more: everywhere are sign=posts. Well put.
Posted by: Brian Lowery on February 11, 2009
Brian,
I too enjoy Springsteen and have for many years. I began listening to his music in the early 80's and saw him about 4 times in Tacoma, WA. One of his most memorable lyrics is in the song Better Days from the album with the same name. "It's a sad man my friend who's living in his own skin and he can't stand the company." I've actaully used this in a couple of sermons.
I have had to filter the music through my "Christian filter" after I became a believer in 1991. However there is still plenty of truth in his music and what he captures is what many people do believe and are looking for today. The challenge for us as preachers is to build bridges for non-believers who sense that they want to work on a dream. Francis Schaeffer was a master at reading the art and music of his day in order to uunderstand what was going on, and then built bridges to those who were in the various cultures. I think you are right, the country wants to work at building a dream, so the challenge to us is how can the church tap into that and build a bridge to non-believers that engages them in a dream that is Kingdom-centric.
Posted by: Jeff Turner on February 11, 2009
“...my mind is spinning with ideas...to uphold...to contend with in this cultural text....I’d like to hear from you.”
How about hearing insight from Charles Colson; excerpts of which below were taken from his book “Against the Night: Living in the New Dark Ages”?
“I’m reminded of E.B. White’s comment: ‘People have re-cut their clothes to follow the fashion....People [have] remodeled their ideas too – taken in their convictions a little at the waist, shortened the sleeves of their resolve, and fitted themselves out in a new intellectual ensemble copied from a smart design out of the very latest page of history.’
"When slavery to fashion invades the church, our latest ideas are yesterday’s fads. We adopt the world’s agenda – just a few years too late. Many churchmen sport theological bell-bottoms.
“Respect for dogma is not likely to endear us to the relativistic culture we seem so intent upon pleasing, however. Orthodoxy often requires us to be hard precisely where the world is soft, and soft where the world is hard. It means condemning the homosexual lifestyle and being labeled bigots. It means caring for AIDS patients though many think us fools. It means respecting the rule of law though our culture is increasingly lawless. It means visiting the prisoners who offend that law though our culture would prefer to forget them. In every way that matters, Christianity is an affront to the world; it is counter-cultural.”
Posted by: still on February 13, 2009
Jeff - Thanks for stopping by and sharing your heart. Good thought on pushing us to consider the ministry of Francis Schaeffer. He was a master for sure.
Still - So I'm assuming you would contend with this cultural text? Thanks for tossing some thoughts into the mix for us to consider. I suspect most everyone sees that Bruce-centric ideas are not fully-orbed kingdom-centric ideas - thus there's much to contend with - but a word of caution is always in order to remind us that this isn't about a new fad or hemming our clothes to look in fashion.
Posted by: Brian Lowery on February 13, 2009