Subscribe!

The Practical
Journal for Church
Leaders
Save 21%

About This Blog


Sites We're Watching


Miscellaneous
Movies
Books
Music
March 17, 2009

Learning how to preach to both

Though it's always a little dangerous to do so, take a glance at the magazine covers the next time you're standing in the check-out lane at the grocery store. I'm willing to bet the farm that you're going to see something about singer Rihanna on every single cover. The Barbadian singer burst onto the music scene with her so-popular-it-was-actually-covered-by-Keith-Urban-yes-Keith-Urban single "Umbrella." But that's not why she's on the cover of People and US Weekly and who knows what else these days. She's in the news because rapper-boyfriend Chris Brown brutally assaulted her in early February. The details of the attack are horrifying.

As expected, the media coverage was less than tasteful. News programs breathlessly broadcast every rumor that came their way. As soon as they could get their grimy little hands on them, gossip magazines and websites posted pictures of Rihanna's injuries, making it one of Google's top searched-for items. I wouldn't be surprised if the E! Entertainment Network immediately got to work on their True Hollywood Story special about the whole mess.

And as expected, the media coverage has also been less than thoughtful. I mean, is this the most critical question CBS could think of: Is Chris Brown's Career Over? Still, in the media's defense, they have asked a very important question in the midst of rumors that Rihanna is getting back together with Brown: Why Would She Go Back? The problem is that the media isn't asking even deeper questions, and of other people - a problem that a colleague of mine, Camerin Courtney, has pointed out masterfully on the Today's Christian Woman blog. She writes:

While this is all certainly worth discussing [why Rihanna might stay in the relationship], I can't help but wonder: Where is Chris Brown in this story?

There was a passing mention at the end of the Today show segment this morning about how he's already lost an endorsement deal. There are small photos of him and Rihanna, mostly smiling and happy, inside [an] issue of People (a stark contrast to the image of Rihanna's battered face after the alleged attack that have been all over the media).

Why aren't high-profile celebrities publicly denouncing Chris's decision to hit his girlfriend? (To be fair, maybe there have been some that I simply haven't seen.) Why aren't we asking why someone so successful could have such a difficult time handling his anger in appropriate ways? ?

Why? Because, for the most part, domestic violence is seen as a women's issue.

Click here to read the rest of Camerin's thoughts.

All of this has me thinking about our role as preachers in this issue. How are we preaching to help the abused? Actually, maybe the first question is this: Are we preaching to help the abused? In all my life, I've heard one - one - sermon on domestic or relational abuse (and that was only because of my role with Preaching Today). Are we helping the abused navigate the pain, the crippling fear, the shame they sometimes feel - not just through our additional ministry programming, but from the pulpit? Are we using the pastoral mantle to help them break free from the vicious cycle of abuse?

But then how are we preaching to confront - and yes, help - the abusers in our midst? Once again, maybe the first question is this: Are we preaching to confront and help the abusers in our midst? In her blog post, Camerin writes: "[Author on domestic violence] Jackson Katz raised the point that when it comes to cases of domestic violence, our typical question is 'why does she stay?' when the more foundational and troubling question is 'why does he hit?'" So, are we confronting the anger of the abusers - their hunger for power, their tendency to manipulate - in appropriate, redemptive ways? Are we using the prophetic mantle to help them break free from the vicious cycle of abusing others?

Perhaps this is why you don't really hear many sermons on abuse. Preachers have quite a responsibility on their hands. They have to ask the right questions and determine the right course of action that champions the safety of the abused ("Get out, now! And we will help you.") and the redemption of the abusers ("Get help, now! And we will help you."). But as hard as it might be, we cannot ignore this issue. It's everywhere. Today's Christian Woman chose domestic violence as the cause of the year, and I suspect you would be shocked at the level of response this has gotten. Stop what you're doing, and read some of the stories and the subsequent comments from readers. It's heart wrenching, friends. Heart wrenching.

And it's a call to responsible action. (Note "responsible." This isn't something where we can just hop on our horses and rail on about the issue from our pulpits. If we handle this inappropriately and thoughtlessly, we might actually rile the abusers toward more abuse or shame the abused into staying. Again, this is not easy stuff, folks!)

So I'm curious - what have you done/are you doing concerning the issue of abuse? Have you preached on it? If so, what did you do? What would you do differently? What resources have helped? Anything to can give is something we can gain from. Please share so we can all responsibly move forward as preachers and shepherds.

lowery_brian%20copy.jpg
Brian Lowery is managing editor of PreachingToday.com.

Posted by Brian Lowery at 8:34 AM on March 17, 2009

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2323





Comments

Thank you so much for writing this article! Here is another group you will be preaching to: adult survivors of childhood abuse. I wonder, what would be the correct questions to ask of such a one, and of their perpetrators. "Why did she starve you?" "Why did he burn you?" "Why did she poison you?" "Why did he sodomize you?" "Why did she rape you?" Maybe not. Who can go into the head of a perpetrator and reconstruct something that happened years ago? Remember the power of denial and the amnesiac or dissociative power of abuse on the perpetrator. Maybe some good questions might be: "Is today like back then?" Answer: no, the perpetrators have no power. "Are you like you were back then?" The answer is: no, I am now a big, powerful adult. The most difficult thing for a church confronted with child abuse is for them to believe it. I mean, to whom does a toddler go after the first time he is raped? After the 100th time? And, for example, how does a husband view his wife sexually after he (the husband) has been sexually abused by men and women during the first two decades of his life, the decades that God designed for him to learn all about himself, other people and God? How does an adult Christian woman view work (that which gives her food), when the persons who were, in effect, God to her, her perpetrators, took away, or poisoned, her food, seemingly at random? Can she trust that God will now provide for her?

Posted by: Celia Lovejoy on March 19, 2009

Both the abusers and the abused need to be addressed. Men should be reminded that just as Christ did not come to be served but to serve and give His life for the betterment of others, so should this be the attitude in marriage. Instead we have been teaching men that they get to lead, to decide, to direct. This leaves the door open to selfish means.

Women need to be informed that their submission is not one of obedience to the orders and demands of her husband, but rather freely giving herself toward the betterment of her husband, in ways that she sees are best. IOW her submission is not a response to anything but is self instigated which of course can included responding.

We as Christians need to promote godly holy love born by the Holy Spirit rather than human inclinations and purposes.

Posted by: tiro on March 19, 2009

The issue of abuse is the core foundation of one's being. It contains three elements innate in everyone-self, soul and spirit. If the core is damaged or lost, self cannot be what it was intended to be. The core is instinctively protected and saved at all costs. So actually trying to preach a sermon that only touches the top of the iceberg could do more damage than good. Professionals have designed to provide a safe, and protective proactive method for dealing with the emotional component of abuse. I think the church needs to address abuse only by what the bible states and do not add anything that isn't biblical. We are taught to love and treat others as ourself. Preachers need to address this love and really what that means.

Posted by: Janice Vickers on March 19, 2009

We need to consider that in certain sectors of the Christian community women have been mis-taught what the Bible actually says about women. Certain verses of Paul's were mistranslated into English and are being used to treat women as if they are either the property of men or as if they are perpetual children. Other verses are translated accurately but their meaning is being slanted to put women underneath the power of men.

These teachings have caused women tremendous agony and pain. Yet those who teach in this manner refuse to admit that they are harming women. Instead they keep promoting their teachings as the word of God. This is causing irreparable harm to women.

Parts of the Christian community are dangerous for women, but the Christian community prefers to ignore it.

I am losing my respect for that part of the Christian community that keeps pressuring women to adhere to a distorted view of what the Bible says about women.

Posted by: a.b.e. on March 20, 2009

I have abused my wife with cruel verbage. I have abandoned my wife because I committed adultery and is afraid to tell her. The family thinks I'm in Louisiana to take care of my elderly father, which is the opposite. My wife thinks I am coming home and doesn't know how to tell her I'm not. I left her and is aware that she is sick and without funds. Have I sinned against God? How can I make this right by her?

Posted by: Darrel Joseph January on August 8, 2009

Post a comment






Remember Me?

(1500 characters max; you may use HTML tags for style)

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

 


  back to top