As I noted in the last post, I'm at the Basics conference this week (hosted by Alistair Begg and the good folks at Parkside). I'm going to do my best to post from time to time (as technology allows). I'm having some issues with the Word program on the company computer, so forgive me for any typos. I usually write in Word first to check for spelling/grammar errors. That's a no go as of right now. Anyway, a few thoughts on John Lennox's session from earlier today...
Dr. John Lennox is the Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford and a noted apologist who has vigorously debated the new atheists, including Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens. I have to say, Dr. Lennox's session was the highlight of the day for me. Here on the blog (and on the main site), we've long been talking about the rise of the new atheists in America and abroad. It's a challenge for all of us who preach. In fact, Dr. Lennox pointed out that more and more preachers are facing congregants who arrive at services with their eyes pointed forward toward the pulpit with a finger in a book by Dawkins or Sam Harris. They have questions. Lots of them. And what alarms Dr. Lennox is that many preachers don't have answers. They've not kept abreast of the issues at hand. They've not thought things through beyond a spate of basic answers. In short, we aren't living out the imperatives found in a passage like 1 Peter 3:13-18. (And in case any of us gathered in the auditorium thought we were, a few challenging questions from Dr. Lennox put us all in our place - When was the last I dialogues with someone about these complicated issues? When was the last time I put myself in a situation to do just that? What have I been reading? What have I given others to read to help in their search? All convicting questions.)
But aren't "some made to be apologists"? Well, that's not really in our list from Ephesians is it? It's not there because we are all made to be apologists. Dr. Lennox insisted that we drop the notion of apologetics being a specialized field. It's a calling for us all (again, see the passage from 1 Peter).
So what do we do?
We tell our story. When pressed into apologetics before Roman leaders, Paul told us his journey from bigot to believer.
We sharpen our Swords. As Dr. Lennox pointed out, the only way to keep them sharp is to use them daily.
We cast our fear and take our message to the marketplaces. God wants to be heard. Let's let him.
As he noted throughout - it won't be easy. It requires great work, great study, a great dedication toward moving from feeding lambs to feeding sheep (lambs want a mere bottle of milk to their lips, sheep wants something more...are prone to wander...prone to stubbornness), but it's worth it. And so much is at stake.
*A few other notes: John Piper offered a session entitled "Preaching a Justification Undiminished." It was an extension of one of his recent books, The Future of Justification, that offers a push-back against the new Pauline perspective and other challenges toward traditional theological frameworks. If you want to learn morea about this swirling controversy, I suggest you go ahead and check out Piper's work - and then it would be good to take a look at N. T. Wright's recent push back against the push back (2009's Justification)! Interesting stuff...
*By the way, I had supper with the folks from the Truth for Life radio program and website. They said all the sessions from the conference (and all of Alistair Begg's sermons) will soon be available on their site for free download. Check it out.
Brian Lowery is managing editor of PreachingToday.com.Posted by Brian Lowery at 9:19 PM on May 11, 2009
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2775
Post a comment


Comments
(I didn't know sheep eat meat. Scary.)
How prepared does Dr. Lennox suggest we need to be? Do we all need to understand the physics behind the expansion of the universe, etc.? Should we be able to communicate in light years and nanoseconds? Is he suggesting that we learn to speak a scientific vocabulary, for example, or is that answering a fool according to his folly?
What kind of specialized knowledge does he suggest the new apologist needs?
Posted by: Brandon on May 12, 2009
"As he noted throughout - it won't be easy. It requires great work, great study, a great dedication toward moving from feeding lambs to feeding sheep (the movement from milk to meat), but it's worth it. And so much is at stake."
Thanks Brian for sharing this. I needed to hear it...it was encouraging.
Posted by: JB on May 12, 2009
Brandon,
That sheep comment made me laugh. My mistake. I was mixing his metaphor with a Scriptural metaphor. I'll change that, because I originally typed up a brief note on Paul's word about milk to meat. My apologies. I wrote that piece really quickly. I beleive his point concerning lambs and sheep was that sheep are a bit more stubborn in nature - require a little more than just milk from a bottle. Again, sorry about that.
As for how far we ought to go in our study, no, I don't think he would argue for deep scientific study, though I think he would argue for us to pay attention to what is being written and have some working understanding. What he stressed more than anything is the approach of Paul. He had a working understanding of the philosophies of the day, but at times he simply told his story, his personal narrative, his movement from bigot to believer, and God used it to silence the wise and learned and the politically influential. As Lennox stressed, we don't have to be experts. We have to be prepared and ready for dialogues and - this is important - ready to say "I don't know," yet push ourselves to go off and learn and come back for more dialogue. So again, I don't mean to paint a picture of Lennox pushing for pastor-scientists - but pastors-apologists who know our narrative and a working understanding of the narratives that are contending with God's narrative. Make sense?
JB - GLad this has been of great help. I love hearing that.
Posted by: brian lowery on May 12, 2009
Thanks for clarifying, Brian. That's a big help.
And no sweat about the carnivorous sheep. I kind of enjoy the mental image...
Posted by: Brandon on May 12, 2009
"We tell our story. When pressed into apologetics before Roman leaders, Paul told us his journey from bigot to believer."
Can you help me? Where is this story found? In Acts?
Thanks!
Posted by: Anonymous on May 12, 2009
See Acts 20 onward, especially Acts 26. Paul weaves his story into his defense. It's an echo of what he does in Philippians 3.
Posted by: brian lowery on May 12, 2009